Neutrophils, which constitute 50 –
70% of circulating white blood cells, are much more numerous than other
granulocytes namely eosinophils (1% - 3%) and basophils (<1 %) and are the first
cells recruited from the bloodstream to sites of infection.
Following activation by bacterial
byproducts or other immune stimuli - such as LPS, fMLP, PMA - neutrophils
execute several specialized functions that include chemotaxis, phagocytosis,
and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). PMA, an analog of DAG,
stimulates ROS production by activation of protein kinase C, whereas fMLP is a
G-protein coupled receptor agonist.
The primary aim of this study was
to investigate the use of DHR in a flow cytometric assay as a semi-quantitative
measure of the respiratory burst in neutrophils.
Heparinized
blood was obtained from healthy adult volunteers. Neutrophils were isolated by
centrifugation on Percoll gradient followed by hypotonic lysis of residual red
blood cells. Five aliquots of 4x105 cells each were activated for 30
minutes with either fMLP at 10 nM, 100 nM or 1000 nM, PMA at 100nM, or no
activation (control). Prior to activation, the aliquots were incubated with
dihydrorhodamine 123 for 5 minutes at room temperature.
The
samples were then analyzed using a flow cytometer (FACScalibur) and CellQuest
software. The forward and side light scatter profiles were adjusted to ensure
that the neutrophil population was clearly displayed. Fluorescence was measured
on the FL1 green channel (wavelength 530 nm). A total of 10,000 events were
collected for each sample.
One
of the greatest advantages of this assay over other conventional assays – such
as spectrophotometry, luminol-based assays - is the ability to measure
oxidative burst at the single cell level. Therefore, the percentage of cells
presenting fluorescence as a measure of respiratory burst higher than control
cells may be determined. In this regard, our results have shown that activation
with fMLP resulted in an increased number of ROS-producing cells by 51.9%,
whereas PMA activated almost every cell in the sample (99.7%).
Furthermore,
increasing concentrations of fMLP gave significantly higher number of
stimulated cells (from 31.53% to 61.50%), although not higher fluorescence.
Kinetic studies also show that the time required for stimulation with fMLP is
significantly larger than with PMA.